MARK ZOLLER
01/Season by season
3 seasons
| Season | Club | G | MIN | PTS | PPG | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FG | FG% | 3P | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006-07 | Pennsylvania | 30 | 935 | 546 | 18.2 | 225 | 87 | 54 | 12 | 81 | 198-350 | 56.6% | 39-102 | 38.2% | 78.2% |
| 2005-06 | Pennsylvania | 26 | 757 | 335 | 12.9 | 198 | 41 | 41 | 20 | 67 | 134-271 | 49.4% | 25-73 | 34.2% | 61.8% |
| 2004-05 | Pennsylvania | 27 | 584 | 253 | 9.4 | 170 | 27 | 18 | 4 | 50 | 101-190 | 53.2% | 8-25 | 32.0% | 65.2% |
| REGULAR SEASON TOTAL | 3 seasons | 83 | 2,276 | 1,134 | 13.7 | 593 | 155 | 113 | 36 | 198 | 433-811 | 53.4% | 72-200 | 36.0% | 71.0% |
02/2006-07 game log
Regular season
| Date | Opponent | Result | GS | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FG | 3P | FT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NOV 10 | @ UTEP | L 66–69 | — | 37 | 23 | 12 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 10-18 | 0-5 | 3-5 |
| NOV 12 | @ Syracuse | L 60–78 | — | 31 | 11 | 5 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 2-7 | 0-3 | 7-8 |
| NOV 12 | @ St. Francis Brooklyn | W 86–56 | — | 26 | 22 | 7 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 7-12 | 1-2 | 7-8 |
| NOV 19 | vs Florida Gulf Coast | W 97–74 | — | 29 | 26 | 5 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 9-11 | 2-4 | 6-8 |
| NOV 22 | vs Drexel | W 68–49 | — | 34 | 16 | 10 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 8 | 6-12 | 2-4 | 2-3 |
| NOV 29 | vs Monmouth | W 80–66 | — | 34 | 29 | 11 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 12-16 | 3-5 | 2-3 |
| DEC 3 | vs Villanova | L 89–99 | — | 37 | 33 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 9-12 | 5-6 | 10-10 |
| DEC 8 | @ Navy | W 79–58 | — | 34 | 16 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 6-12 | 2-4 | 2-2 |
| DEC 10 | vs Fordham | L 60–77 | — | 33 | 14 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 6-13 | 1-5 | 1-3 |
| DEC 22 | vs UIC | W 90–78 | — | 37 | 21 | 13 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 8-19 | 2-5 | 3-7 |
| DEC 23 | @ Seton Hall | L 85–94 | — | 37 | 23 | 12 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 6-10 | 1-3 | 10-12 |
| JAN 4 | @ North Carolina | L 64–102 | GS | 36 | 8 | 10 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 6 | 4-9 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
| JAN 6 | @ Elon | W 66–64 | — | 23 | 8 | 7 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 2-8 | 2-4 | 2-4 |
| JAN 13 | @ Cornell | W 74–56 | — | 30 | 16 | 7 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 7-12 | 1-5 | 1-1 |
| JAN 14 | @ Columbia | W 69–43 | — | 30 | 11 | 9 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 3-6 | 1-2 | 4-4 |
| JAN 19 | @ La Salle | W 93–92 | GS | 32 | 28 | 10 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 12-19 | 0-4 | 4-4 |
| JAN 25 | vs Temple | W 76–74 | GS | 38 | 19 | 10 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 6-12 | 0-2 | 7-8 |
| JAN 28 | vs Saint Joseph's | L 74–84 | GS | 40 | 16 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 7-13 | 2-4 | 0-0 |
| JAN 28 | vs Saint Joseph's | L 74–84 | GS | 40 | 16 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 7-13 | 2-4 | 0-0 |
| FEB 3 | @ Yale | L 68–77 | GS | 25 | 8 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 2-10 | 2-6 | 2-4 |
| FEB 3 | @ Brown | W 77–61 | — | 29 | 18 | 7 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 7-13 | 3-4 | 1-1 |
| FEB 10 | vs Dartmouth | W 73–53 | GS | 22 | 19 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 5-9 | 2-3 | 7-8 |
| FEB 11 | vs Harvard | W 67–53 | GS | 32 | 17 | 8 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 5-8 | 0-3 | 7-8 |
| FEB 14 | vs Princeton | W 48–35 | GS | 32 | 17 | 8 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 6-10 | 0-1 | 5-6 |
| FEB 17 | vs Columbia | W 73–54 | GS | 28 | 14 | 6 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 4 | 4-7 | 1-3 | 5-9 |
| FEB 18 | vs Cornell | W 83–71 | GS | 35 | 24 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 1 | 2 | 10-16 | 2-4 | 2-3 |
| FEB 24 | @ Harvard | W 83–67 | GS | 29 | 21 | 8 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 9-15 | 3-6 | 0-0 |
| FEB 25 | @ Dartmouth | W 80–78 | GS | 16 | 13 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 5-7 | 0-0 | 3-3 |
| MAR 3 | vs Yale | W 86–58 | GS | 36 | 22 | 17 | 6 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 9-15 | 1-3 | 3-3 |
| MAR 4 | vs Brown | W 67–64 | — | 18 | 10 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 5-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| MAR 7 | @ Princeton | W 64–48 | GS | 35 | 23 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 9-13 | 0-0 | 5-7 |
The club shown beside the name is the one this player last recorded a box score for, taken from the stat rows rather than from the player table, because a college roster turns over every year and that column holds only the last club the loader saw. Win and loss are derived from the fixture’s own final score and the side the player was on, not read from the stat row, whose result column is empty on all 2,499,568 college basketball rows; a game whose fixture has no score reads “no result on record”. Three-point figures read two spellings of the same key, so games from one early import are counted rather than reported as zero. A player’s season line is the sum of his box scores, so a game the source never published is missing from it rather than counted as a zero.