COREY DEAN
01/Season by season
2 seasons
| Season | Club | G | MIN | PTS | PPG | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FG | FG% | 3P | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2005-06 | Louisiana Tech | 30 | 698 | 240 | 8.0 | 83 | 55 | 23 | 6 | 60 | 89-236 | 37.7% | 13-44 | 29.5% | 75.4% |
| 2004-05 | Louisiana Tech | 23 | 803 | 234 | 10.2 | 90 | 48 | 31 | 3 | 58 | 90-226 | 39.8% | 16-56 | 28.6% | 58.5% |
| REGULAR SEASON TOTAL | 2 seasons | 53 | 1,501 | 474 | 8.9 | 173 | 103 | 54 | 9 | 118 | 179-462 | 38.7% | 29-100 | 29.0% | 66.9% |
02/2004-05 game log
Regular season
| Date | Opponent | Result | GS | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FG | 3P | FT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NOV 19 | @ Louisiana | L 63–84 | — | 39 | 6 | 5 | 8 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2-7 | 0-2 | 2-3 |
| NOV 21 | @ Tulane | W 69–66 | — | 36 | 12 | 6 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 6-15 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| NOV 30 | @ UAB | L 54–66 | — | 31 | 7 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 1-5 | 0-1 | 5-5 |
| DEC 4 | vs UTSA | W 73–64 | — | 37 | 17 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 7-13 | 1-3 | 2-5 |
| DEC 8 | @ Jackson State | W 75–61 | — | 35 | 15 | 7 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 7 | 4-8 | 0-1 | 7-8 |
| DEC 12 | @ UTSA | L 71–79 | — | 34 | 10 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4-13 | 0-1 | 2-7 |
| DEC 31 | @ Tulsa | W 58–52 | — | 25 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1-2 | 0-1 | 1-2 |
| JAN 7 | vs Nevada | L 56–64 | — | 32 | 11 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4-8 | 1-3 | 2-4 |
| JAN 9 | vs Fresno State | L 58–60 | — | 35 | 9 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 4-15 | 1-5 | 0-0 |
| JAN 14 | @ San José State | L 87–88 | — | 40 | 23 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 11-16 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| JAN 23 | vs SMU | W 58–57 | — | 40 | 14 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6-18 | 1-4 | 1-3 |
| JAN 28 | vs Boise State | W 93–60 | — | 28 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2-6 | 0-1 | 1-3 |
| JAN 30 | vs UTEP | W 80–65 | — | 36 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2-6 | 2-2 | 0-0 |
| FEB 4 | @ Fresno State | W 79–72 | — | 38 | 13 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 5-12 | 1-4 | 2-2 |
| FEB 6 | @ Nevada | L 58–76 | — | 36 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1-5 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| FEB 17 | @ SMU | L 70–73 | — | 40 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 1-8 | 1-3 | 3-4 |
| FEB 19 | vs New Orleans | L 85–87 | — | 35 | 11 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 5-9 | 1-4 | 0-1 |
| FEB 26 | @ UTEP | L 69–89 | — | 26 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 2-8 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
| FEB 27 | @ Boise State | L 75–79 | — | 27 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1-8 | 0-3 | 0-0 |
| MAR 4 | vs Rice | L 64–78 | — | 37 | 24 | 5 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 8-13 | 1-2 | 7-12 |
| MAR 6 | vs Tulsa | W 91–82 | — | 35 | 19 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 6-10 | 4-5 | 3-6 |
| MAR 11 | @ Fresno State | L 81–84 | — | 43 | 12 | 8 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 6-15 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
The club shown beside the name is the one this player last recorded a box score for, taken from the stat rows rather than from the player table, because a college roster turns over every year and that column holds only the last club the loader saw. Win and loss are derived from the fixture’s own final score and the side the player was on, not read from the stat row, whose result column is empty on all 2,499,568 college basketball rows; a game whose fixture has no score reads “no result on record”. Three-point figures read two spellings of the same key, so games from one early import are counted rather than reported as zero. A player’s season line is the sum of his box scores, so a game the source never published is missing from it rather than counted as a zero.